Ask questions, discover challenges, and follow the most helpful contributors.
Design and share a comprehensive HR automation workflow to streamline employee onboarding, management, or offboarding.
46 discussions match the current filters.
As i am planning to fetch youtube links for my ai agent travel planer it again and again found broken links and findings the videos which are no longer exists . but it is initially is working fine .
ITS STUCK AT THINKING CAN U FIX IT I SAW THE ANSWER IN ANOTHER POST BUT ITS STUCK
please help me to continue the workflow
the draft mails containing details of followup questions and doctor appointment is not being sent to the respective mails and confirmation mail is also not sent
I am building a multi-agent workflow using saved subsystem agents. Most agents are attaching and working correctly inside the main orchestrator. However, **two specific sub-agents are not getting loaded**, even though: * They are correctly created and saved * They are visible and selectable in the system * The platform acknowledges them when referenced **Issue Details:** * When adding these sub-agents using: > “add another calling subsystem agent” * The system: * Recognizes the agent name * Confirms selection (e.g., “Selected subworkflow: X agent”) * BUT: * The agent does NOT appear in the workflow graph * It does NOT execute * It does NOT pass any output * It behaves as if it was never attached **Important Observation:** * Other sub-agents (Research, Budget, etc.) attach and work correctly * Only specific agents (e.g., Poster / PPT / Document — depending on your case) fail to load **Expected Behavior:** * Once a sub-agent is selected, it should: * Be added as a node in the workflow * Execute when triggered * Return output to the main agent **Actual Behavior:** * Sub-agent is acknowledged but not instantiated in the workflow * No execution or output occurs **Questions:** 1. Is there a limitation on certain types of agents (e.g., output-heavy agents like PPT, image generation, etc.) being attached as sub-agents? 2. Are there hidden requirements for sub-agents to be usable (e.g., specific structure, tool usage, or output format)? 3. Is this a UI issue (agent not shown) or a backend binding issue? 4. Is there a way to verify whether a sub-agent is actually linked vs just referenced? This issue is blocking integration of the final output stage of the workflow. Would appreciate guidance or confirmation if this is a known limitation/bug.
### Despite enabling all the necessary permissions for PAT in Github, This AI agent fires :- Reason for Interruption **_"I've generated the corrected code, but my GitHub token lacks the 'Write' permissions necessary to update the repository directly (Update failed with status 403.)."_** This is the same for Updating code, Writing Comments and other such basic stuff.
there were error created from supervity while editing code of human approval to supervity confimation message so i fixed that issue from supervityin code but to run new execution first need to terminate the old one which compulsory states: The EquiVeda is now the active master version of your orchestrator. The system has registered the execution and is currently clearing the previous process blocks. This run is strictly enforcing the 405 routing fix and the High-Contrast Dark Theme to ensure you can easily read the intelligence and manually approve the case. What to expect now: System Reset: The agents are refreshing the pipeline to ensure the new variable interpolation rules are active. Visual Dashboard: You will receive a notification to enter the Verification Gateway. This time, all analytics will be in clear, deep slate text. Functional Controls: The "Approve" and "Reject" buttons are now correctly mapped to the server, allowing you to proceed to the storage phase without errors. also in website shows : Oops! 405 Error Error: You made a POST request to "/u/user- forms/%7Bapprove\_api\_url%7D" but did not provide an \`action' for route "routes/u+/user- forms.$formld", so there is no way to handle the request. +Go Back Go to Homepage and: X Unexpected Error Cannot read properties of null (reading 'honeyProps') \-Go Back Go to Homepage i have tell it to improve code but to execute next run previous pending runs needs to be finished, what should i do ?? I am stuck
{ "error": "ValidationError", "code": "VALIDATION", "message": "Invalid request parameters" } Ask In Chat
Fetch Unread EmailsCompleted Fetches your most recent unread priority emails. Started at: Mar 26, 2026, 11:57:03 PM Completed at: Mar 26, 2026, 11:57:13 PM Outputs ### **Notion Sync Interrupted** An error occurred while connecting to Notion: API token is invalid. this type of error i am encountering Fetch Notion TasksCompleted Fetches pending to-do items from your Notion workspace, validating authentication. Started at: Mar 26, 2026, 11:57:05 PM Completed at: Mar 26, 2026, 11:57:13 PM Outputs ### **Inbox is Clear** No new unread priority emails were found in your Microsoft Outlook account. Your briefing will proceed based on other intelligence sources.
the workflow stuck at thinking state after I approved the plan for execution

some settings are currently **optional or empty** (for example, the "Schedule" is empty because we aren't using the monthly automation yet). In the digital language used to build the workflow (JSON), these empty spots are marked with the word `null`. **The Problem:** When I tried to "launch" the workflow just now, the platform's internal engine accidentally tried to read those `null` markers as **Python computer code** instead of just **data**. In the Python coding language, `null` doesn't exist (it uses a different word, `None`), so the system got confused, threw a "NameError," and stopped because it didn't know what `null` meant.

Technical Issue Report Error Message: CodeExecutionError: NameError: name 'null' is not defined Problem Description: The workflow execution engine is failing to interpret the generated Workflow JSON because of a conflict between JSON syntax and the Python execution environment. Detailed Breakdown for Support: JSON vs. Python Conflict: The platform generates a standard JSON structure to define the workflow. This JSON uses the keyword null for empty or optional fields (e.g., schedule: null or subworkflow_call: null). Improper Evaluation: During the execution phase, it appears the server is attempting to evaluate the JSON data as raw Python code instead of parsing it as a data object. In Python, the equivalent of null is None. Because the server is seeing the literal word null without quotes, it treats it as an undefined variable, triggering the NameError. Attempts at Mitigation: We have attempted to bypass this by: Manually replacing null with empty strings "" and empty objects {}. Completely omitting optional keys from the JSON. Reducing the workflow to a single-step Python script. Persistent Failure: Despite these "null-free" configurations, the platform's internal logic seems to be re-injecting null into the final execution payload for hidden schema fields, causing the workflow to crash before it even begins the first step. Requested Fix: Please ensure that the workflow execution engine either: Correctly parses the workflow JSON using a library like json.loads() before evaluation. Pre-defines null = None in the global execution context to handle standard JSON literals.
sample debugging scenario
Zoho books is not connecting to agent ,it just loads the zoho dashboard and thats it. gets stuck there.
The final attempt at execution has confirmed the same technical failure. Here is the detailed explanation of what is happening behind the scenes: ### **Technical Failure Report** * **Error Type**: `NameError` * **Error Message**: `name 'null' is not defined` * **Point of Failure**: The very first line of the internal script execution. ### **Detailed Explanation** The issue is a "language barrier" between the workflow's storage and its execution: 1. **The Injection**: Even though we told the AI to avoid the word "null," the platform's underlying system automatically generates a small piece of code to "prepare" your inputs before the AI starts. 2. **The Conflict**: This system-generated code is using the word `null` (which is standard for database storage) instead of `None` (which is required for the Python programming language that runs the workflow). 3. **The Crash**: Because Python does not know what `null` means, it treats it as an undefined name and stops the entire process instantly. This happens **before** our custom instructions or your input text are even read by the AI. ### **Conclusion** This is an internal platform conflict that cannot be fixed by changing the prompt or the workflow's plan. Now that the workflow is **saved**, a technical administrator can go into the back-end settings to manually change how those inputs are initialized, replacing the problematic `null` with the correct Python `None`.
When connecting ANY Microsoft integration (OneDrive, Outlook, SharePoint), I get this error immediately after Microsoft login: {"error":"ValidationError","code":"VALIDATION", "message":"Invalid request parameters"} Steps I tried: - Tried 2 different Microsoft accounts - Tried OneDrive, Outlook separately - Same error on all Microsoft integrations - Please help . Username: Saketh Suman Bathini Date: 25 March 2026
ive created a ai code review and given token with all the permission but still not working
I tried executing a deadline email reminder, where the user enters input, deadline and email. the input is being taken but the email isnt being sent. Its showing that the event is sent, but theres no such email in my mail inbox.
connectors · What is the issue ?
JWT_SECRET environment variable is not defined. · Please add some more context or recreate this issue by attaching thread / audit runs /workflow
JWT_SECRET environment variable is not defined.
connectors
Workflow getting stuck in thinking state · Noted. Going forwards ill minimize the prompt which only focuses on the tasks.
Workflow getting stuck in thinking state · We will be creating a new thread for same workflow for you as token cap is reached for that thr…
Cloud Agent Error:Request is taking longer than 30 seconds to fulfill.
Unable to connect Monday.com · Oauth apps sometimes cache the auth data , you can clear the site data for monday.com and it wi…
Unable to connect Monday.com
human in review form not visible